Understand the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and its impact on businesses. Learn about GST rates, compliance requirements, and its role in simplifying taxation. Stay updated with the latest GST news and updates.
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains why retrospective GST cancellation alone should not result in ITC denial where buyers have complied with Sect...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT offers broader powers than the First Appellate Authority but faces challenges relating to pre-deposit, timelines, and digita...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that notifications under Sections 9 and 11 of the CGST Act cannot go beyond GST Council recommendations...
Goods and Services Tax : Explains when to issue a Tax Invoice or Bill of Supply under GST and how the correct document helps avoid ITC disputes, notices, a...
Goods and Services Tax : The article explains that GSTAT can condone delay only within the statutory extension under the CGST Act, unlike CESTAT....
Goods and Services Tax : A PIB backgrounder explains how nine years of GST have expanded the taxpayer base, increased collections, and simplified India's i...
Goods and Services Tax : Haryana recorded the highest State GST revenue growth of 32% during the first quarter of FY 2026-27, outperforming all other state...
Goods and Services Tax : The representation requests extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues ...
Goods and Services Tax : A representation seeks extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persistent technical issues on th...
Goods and Services Tax : The Advocates Tax Bar Association has requested extension of the GSTAT appeal filing deadline to 31 December 2026, citing persiste...
Income Tax : ITAT held that GST refund is not taxable where the tax component was never claimed as expenditure and was recorded as a receivable...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that a single GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is without jurisdiction and imper...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court held that clubbing five assessment years in a single GST show cause notice is contrary to Section 73 of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Bombay High Court held that a GST order based on a notice issued to a dissolved company is void, while allowing fresh proceedings ...
Goods and Services Tax : Chhattisgarh HC granted bail after finding no unimpeachable document proving the applicant owned the firm. Issues of involvement w...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has shifted the FY 2025-26 AATO amendment window to 1–31 July 2026 due to system upgrades. Tax officer review will take pla...
Goods and Services Tax : June 2026 gross GST collections reached Rs. 1.94 lakh crore, driven by higher domestic and import revenues, while net collections ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government has fixed 31 July 2026 as the last date for filing GST Appellate Tribunal appeals and applications in specified old...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC clarified that proceedings validly initiated before a taxpayer's jurisdiction changes remain legally valid. The new jurisdict...
CA, CS, CMA : KSCAA has urged the Government to extend the GSTAT appeal filing deadline by three months, citing technical glitches, procedural a...
The Delhi High Court held that the amended limitation provision under Section 54 cannot be applied retrospectively to deny refund claims relating to earlier periods. It ruled that vested rights under the unamended law must be preserved.
The Bombay High Court held that recovery proceedings cannot continue while the statutory period to file an appeal under Section 112 of the CGST Act remains available. It ruled that premature recovery would render the statutory appellate remedy ineffective.
The article explains how the GSTAT held that a mere mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B is insufficient to invoke Section 74 without evidence of fraud or suppression. It also outlines practical steps for responding to mismatch notices.
The article explains why the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the Revenue’s SLP does not conclusively settle the GST treatment of leasehold rights assignments. It highlights the continuing statutory conflict and the likelihood of future litigation.
The Kerala High Court held that merely reporting eligible IGST credit under CGST and SGST instead of IGST did not amount to excess input tax credit or justify proceedings under Section 73 of the GST Act.
Delhi High Court ruled that the amendment restricting Explanation 2(e) applies prospectively and cannot take away vested refund rights relating to earlier tax periods. The Department was directed to decide the refund claims on merits.
The High Court held that a GST penalty order passed without issuing a prior show cause notice violates Section 75(4) of the CGST Act and principles of natural justice. The penalty was quashed with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings in accordance with law.
The Delhi High Court held that uploading an SCN only under the ‘Additional Notices’ tab without effective communication does not amount to valid service. The GST demand was quashed as the taxpayer was denied a fair opportunity to respond.
The Supreme Court upheld the GST framework governing betting, gambling, casinos, lotteries, and online money gaming. The key takeaway is that specified actionable claims have been taxable since the inception of GST, with the 2023 amendments being clarificatory.
The Allahabad High Court refused to recall its earlier judgment after holding that it had already delivered a detailed decision on merits and that no valid ground for recall was established.
