Company Law : The scheme provides a last opportunity for defaulting companies to file pending returns and financial statements with reduced pena...
Company Law : This guide explains the mandatory conditions, documentation, and procedural steps for converting a partnership into a company. It ...
Company Law : The case examined whether extending redemption timelines amounts to reissuance. The Tribunal held that extensions within statutory...
Company Law : MCA has confirmed that extension of annual filing timelines till 31st December 2025 does not extend statutory deadline for holding...
Company Law : A guide to issuing bonus shares for private companies under the Companies Act, 2013, covering legal frameworks, procedural steps, ...
Company Law : The initiative addresses inefficiencies in the current filing system and proposes consolidation and automation. It highlights a sh...
Company Law : NFRA found major deficiencies in audit documentation and archival practices. The report highlights the need for stronger controls ...
Company Law : The inspection report highlights deficiencies in audit documentation, independence monitoring and compliance with auditing standar...
Company Law : The regulator found that the audit firm lacked an effective monitoring mechanism to ensure firmwide independence policies were pro...
Company Law : NFRAs inspection found gaps in audit documentation, revenue testing, and risk assessment practices, stressing the need for stronge...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : That the period of lockdown ordered by the Central Government and the State Governments including the period as may be extended ei...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for failing to disclose PAN and e-mail IDs of allottees in Form PAS-3. The order ...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a Nidhi company and its directors for incomplete allottee disclosures in Form PAS-3. The order clarifies tha...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a Nidhi company and its directors for filing incomplete allottee details in Form PAS-3. The ruling clarifies...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for filing Form MGT-7 more than 500 days late under Section 92 of the Companies A...
Company Law : ROC Chennai penalised a company and its director for delayed filing of Form MGT-14 relating to approval of financial statements an...
On requests received from various Corporates & Professionals and difficulties experienced by the stakeholders in filing Form No.8 and Form No.10 (for modification of charges under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFESI), it has now been decided to accept filing of the followings Forms:-
Notice for filing Form-8 & 11 for the Financial Year ended 31-03-2012 All LLPs registered upto 30-September-2011 have to mandatorily close the financial year as on 31-03-2012 and file Form-11 by 30-May-2012 and Form-8 by 30- October-2012.
It has been decided by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs to mandate the cost auditors and the companies to file Cost Audit Reports (Form-I) and Compliance Reports (Form-A) for the year 2011-12 onwards (including the overdue reports relating to any previous year) by using the XBRL taxonomy. These reports, required to be filed in the XBRL format, would be based on the Taxonomy on XBRL being developed for the formats (Form-I & Form-A) given in the following Rules :
Investor Education and Protection Fund (Uploading of information regarding unpaid and unclaimed amounts lying with companies) Rules, 2012, has mandated every company to file eForm 5INV containing the information of unclaimed and unpaid amounts as referred to in subsection (2) of section 205C of the Companies Act, 1956.
All the names applications submitted in STP mode will be put for system check and if there is exact match of any of the two words (other than the words private limited/limited) proposed in new company’s name with any existing company’s name, then such name will also be processed in non-STP mode.
Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms (Amendment) Rules, 2012 – Substitution of Forms 23C and 23D. Notification No. G.S.R. 313(E), dated 24-4-2012 – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (l) of section 642, read with section 610B of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms, 1956, namely:
In Schedule XIV to the Companies Act, 1956, after serial number IV relating to Ships and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and entries shall be inserted, namely:- Intangible Assets (Toll Road) created under Build, Operate and Transfer, Build, Own, Operate and Transfer or any other form of Public Private Partnership Route.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section -2T-fiA of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), the Central Government hereby constitutes the National Advisory Committee on Accounting Standards, for a period up to the 28th February, 2013 with effect from the date of publication of this notification, consisting of the following persons to advise the Central Government on the formulation and laying down of accounting policies and accounting standards for adoption by companies or class of companies under the said Act, namely
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of rule 5A of the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms, 1956, the Central Government hereby appoints the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Guwahati, as the prescribed authority for the purposes of clause (a) of sub-section (IA) of Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956 (I of 1956).
Chapter VII of the Companies Act deals with winding up procedures to be followed for liquidating the affairs of the company. The present Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 framed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India supplement the winding procedures and it has the effect of an act of Parliament. It provides for every segment of liquidation exhaustively till dissolution of a company in liquidation. However, there are certain areas where various High Court issues instructions to carry out a certain function in a particular manner thus leading to variation from the procedure followed by one Official Liquidator to the another Official Liquidator in the same matter.
