Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad confirms Section 68 addition of ₹93.92 lakh for bogus LTCG from Kushal Tradelink shares, rejecting the appeal bas...
Income Tax : Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price...
Income Tax : Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument rev...
Income Tax : The provision for exemption of long term capital gains from shares requiring payment of securities transaction tax has been taken ...
Income Tax : It is a very well-known fact that High court only entertains question of law and Income tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the last ...
Income Tax : ITAT ruled that genuine sale proceeds supported by books, bank records and purchaser details cannot be treated as unexplained cash...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that an Investigation Wing report alone cannot justify an addition under Section 68 without independent verific...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the addition under Section 68 could not be sustained because the assessee produced complete documentary evi...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer failed to produce any material establishing a connection between the assessee and the all...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT sustained the addition arising from the sale of listed shares after finding discrepancies in purchase records, incl...
Investigate the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruling in ITO vs. Indravadan Jain HUF & its implications for similar cases in the future. Assessing officer’s declarations on SEBI Investigation & LTCG of the assessee addressed.
Taxpayers and professionals alike can learn from Ayushi Jain vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO): LTCG can’t be deemed bogus without substantiated allegations. Understand the intricate details of the ruling from ITAT in Kolkata.
Ahmedabad ITAT dismisses appeal, denying LTCG exemption under Section 10(38) for bogus scrips. Read the full text of the order.
ITAT Mumbai deletes LTCG addition in penny stock case, ruling in favor of Assessee. Landmark decision emphasizes genuine transactions and compliance.
Explore legal battle in Farzad Sheriar Jehani Vs ITO, analyzing assessment of long-term capital gains on a penny stock. Learn about tribunal’s decision and its implications.
ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal due to a low tax effect, as the tax effect was below the threshold prescribed by the CBDT Circular.
DCIT vs. Krishan Kumar case: ITAT Delhi dismisses appeal by the Department regarding share transaction, ruling it doesn’t fall under the CBDT Circular exception.
In the Archana Rajendra Malu vs. ITO case, ITAT Pune upheld the denial of tax exemption under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act due to sham transactions with paper companies.
Assessee has appealed against an order passed by CIT(A) and subsequent addition. Learn more about Capital Gain cannot be treated as bogus without giving reasons.
ITAT Kolkata held that exemption under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act not eligible in respect of long Term Capital Gain from sale of equity shares of penny stock companies listed with Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).
