Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLAT held that a bidder’s exclusion due to an unresolved platform issue warranted reconsideration, especially when a higher offer was available.
The NCLAT held that unregistered profit-sharing agreements do not create leasehold or occupancy rights in immovable property. The tribunal upheld eviction of the occupant from the corporate debtor’s hotel premises during CIRP.
While approving the resolution plan, NCLT clarified that exemptions relating to taxes, duties, and statutory compliances must be obtained from the competent authorities separately. Approval of the plan does not itself waive statutory liabilities.
The First Appellate Authority noted that the CPIO exceeded the statutory RTI timeline by one day. However, since the requested closure letter had been furnished, no further action was considered necessary.
The IBBI held that prolonged failure to hold SCC meetings, delayed progress reporting, and repeated absence before the Adjudicating Authority amounted to serious professional misconduct. The order underscores the importance of strict adherence to statutory duties under the insolvency framework.
The Supreme Court examined whether personal insolvency proceedings under the IBC could halt cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the NI Act. The Court held that such prosecutions are criminal in nature and continue despite insolvency moratorium protections.
IBBI held that an Insolvency Professional cannot delay constitution of the Committee of Creditors based on settlement discussions or creditor reluctance. Failure to follow mandatory CIRP timelines resulted in a three-year suspension.
The Delhi High Court held that acceptance of payment under an approved insolvency resolution plan amounted to settlement of the dispute. As the plaintiff accepted the CIRP amount as full and final settlement, withdrawal of the suit and refund of the entire court fee were permitted.
The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the IBC. The ruling reinforces that insolvency proceedings are not meant for debt recovery or investment disputes.
The Fourth Amendment Regulations, 2026 require committees of creditors to document the rationale behind approving resolution plans and assessing market discovery efforts. The changes aim to improve accountability and transparency in insolvency proceedings.
