Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
The case examined default arising from a loan backed by corporate guarantee. The Tribunal found that non-payment triggered insolvency proceedings. The decision highlights consequences of guarantee invocation.
The issue was condonation of delay in filing returns during CIRP. The SC dismissed the appeal as time-barred, leaving intact the ruling that delay must be condoned to give effect to the resolution plan.
The issue was whether IBBI must provide data held by a regulated entity. The Authority held that RTI applies only to information held or controlled by the public authority, leading to rejection of the appeal.
The Court held that the secured creditor’s rights were limited to project receivables and did not extend to management or contractual control. It ruled that the creditor could not challenge termination of the contract. The decision clarifies limits of secured creditor rights under IBC and SARFAESI.
The Committee recommends shifting from entity-level to project-wise insolvency to avoid delays and protect viable projects. It held that completion, not liquidation, should be the primary objective in real estate insolvency.
The appeal found that the RTI response was delayed beyond statutory timelines. The key takeaway is that delay breaches RTI provisions and limited disclosure may still be required.
This piece examines how restrictive provisions under GST law limit refund of unutilised ITC during insolvency, despite broader enabling clauses. It highlights judicial divergence and the resulting uncertainty for creditors and liquidators under IBC.
The case examines whether insolvency must be admitted upon default. The Supreme Court held that tribunals have discretion to consider financial health, emphasizing revival over automatic admission
The issue was whether an RVO could grant conditional enrolment to an unqualified applicant. The authority held that such enrolment violates valuation rules. The key takeaway is that only fully eligible candidates can be admitted.
The tribunal held that insufficient stamping of a loan agreement does not invalidate insolvency proceedings. Default was established through other documentary evidence. The ruling emphasizes substance over technical defects.
