Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Books Submit Post Subscription
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax Chennai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Deposits Matching Audited Sales and VAT Returns Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Income Tax Chennai ITAT Quashes Reassessment Where No Addition Was Made on the Recorded Reason for Reopening Income Tax Chennai ITAT Upholds Deletion of Ad Hoc Disallowances; GSTR-2A Is Strong Corroborative Evidence and Purchases Cannot Be Rejected Without Verification Income Tax Chennai ITAT Deletes ₹76.45 Lakh Addition; Once Source of Cash Is Proved, Revenue Cannot Rely on Suspicion About Its Temporary Utilisation Income Tax Chennai ITAT Quashes Reassessment Based Solely on AIR Information; Cash Deposits Must Be Examined with Reference to Business Turnover, Not Returned Income Income Tax Lucknow ITAT Deletes ₹1.31 Crore Addition on Cash Deposits by Bank Mitra; Holds Customer Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Agent’s Income Goods and Services Tax GSTAT Upholds DGAP Methodology, Orders Emaar to Pass ₹67.32 Lakh ITC Benefit to Homebuyers Goods and Services Tax CBIC Constitutes Working Group to Examine Centralized Administration of Taxpayers with Multiple GSTINs Under Same PAN
Corporate Law

Delhi HC Permits Suit Withdrawal as Operational Creditor Accepted Resolution Plan Amount

By CA Sandeep Kanoi Corporate Law Judiciary June 8, 2026
Share:

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sainik Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Indian Sugar Manufacturing Company Limited (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number
Only available for paid members
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement
Sainik Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Indian Sugar Manufacturing Company Limited (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court Allows Court Fee Refund Because Claim Was Settled Through Approved Insolvency Resolution Plan;  Delhi HC Orders Refund of Entire Court Fee Because Insolvency Resolution Effectively Settled Recovery Claims;  Court Fee Refund Allowed Because Settlement Need Not Arise Only Through Court-Referred Mediation. The case concerned an application filed by the plaintiff seeking withdrawal of a recovery suit and refund of court fees. The plaintiff had originally instituted a suit for recovery of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement
Filed under

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Related Articles in Corporate Law
Calcutta HC Enhances MACT Compensation; Rejects Insurer’s Reliance on Outdated ITR

Calcutta HC Enhances MACT Compensation; Rejects Insurer’s Reliance on Outdated ITR

July 26, 2026
Kerala HC Upholds Bank’s SARFAESI Sale, Directs Removal of Subsequent Property Attachment

Kerala HC Upholds Bank’s SARFAESI Sale, Directs Removal of Subsequent Property Attachment

July 26, 2026
NCLAT Dismisses State Tax Appeal, Upholds Resolution Plan Distribution to Operational Creditor

NCLAT Dismisses State Tax Appeal, Upholds Resolution Plan Distribution to Operational Creditor

July 26, 2026
NCLAT Rejects State Tax Department’s Secured Creditor Claim Under MVAT Section 37

NCLAT Rejects State Tax Department’s Secured Creditor Claim Under MVAT Section 37

July 26, 2026
SC Acquits Accused Under Section 138 NI Act Due to Patent Material Alteration of Cheque

SC Acquits Accused Under Section 138 NI Act Due to Patent Material Alteration of Cheque

July 26, 2026
Gauhati HC Sets Aside Unilateral Railway Arbitrator Panel for Lack of Section 12(5) Waiver

Gauhati HC Sets Aside Unilateral Railway Arbitrator Panel for Lack of Section 12(5) Waiver

July 26, 2026
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *