Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the plan are still pending before the NCLAT. The statutory embargo under Rule 30(9) must be strictly followed.
Jeel Kandla Service & Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors. (Calcutta High Court) The appeal arose from a judgment of a Single Judge dismissing a writ petition challenging an order of the Regional Director, Eastern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, which had permitted shifting the registered office of a company from West Bengal to […]
The Court noted that the complaint against the Resolution Professional and the related proceedings stemmed from CIRP proceedings before the NCLT, Bengaluru. It therefore declined to adjudicate the matter on merits.
The Supreme Court held that an appeal filed without the mandatory certified copy of the NCLT order was not properly instituted. It set aside the NCLAT’s order condoning delays in filing and refiling the appeal.
NCLAT held that challenges to the approved resolution plan could not be reopened after earlier proceedings had attained finality. The appeal was dismissed as an attempt to re-agitate settled issues.
IBBI imposed a ₹1 lakh penalty after finding that an insolvency professional accepted and continued an assignment despite suspension of his Authorisation for Assignment. The ruling underscores that valid AFA is mandatory for undertaking insolvency assignments.
IBBI has notified amendments across several insolvency regulations to operationalize the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2026. The changes introduce new disclosure, authentication, grievance-handling, and procedural requirements.
The IBBI has amended liquidation regulations to place the Committee of Creditors at the center of the process. The changes aim to improve accountability, decision-making, and value realization during liquidation.
IBBI has amended the CIRP Regulations to enhance disclosures, strengthen information access, and introduce time-bound claim communication. The changes aim to make insolvency resolution more transparent and dispute-resilient.
The article examines how the PMLA’s broad asset retention powers interact with the IBC’s clean-slate protection under Section 32A. The key takeaway is that ED actions may continue during CIRP, but approved resolution plans can ultimately free corporate assets from prior taint.
