This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Refund Cannot Be Recovered Without Statutory Provision Under Section 11B of Excise Act
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Amarnath Sharma Vs Commissioner CGST (Appeals) (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Amarnath Sharma Vs Commissioner CGST (Appeals) (CESTAT Delhi)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, partly allowed the appeal concerning refund of service tax paid on services rendered to the Military Engineering Services (MES). The appellant had provided services during the period April 2015 to February 2016, which were ultimately exempted through retrospective notifications. There was no dispute between the parties that the appellant was entitled to refund on merits. However, it was also undisputed that the appellant had passed on the burden...





