This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Buyer’s Premises May Qualify as Place of Removal in FOR Contracts: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramco Cements Limited Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ramco Cements Limited Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai remanded the appeals filed by the assessee concerning eligibility of CENVAT credit on outward Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services used for transportation of cement sold on FOR destination basis. The dispute related to periods from May 2016 to June 2017, during which the Department disallowed CENVAT credit amounting to ₹45.95 lakh and ₹38.43 lakh on the ground that outward transportation beyond the factory gate or depot was not eligible as “input service”.
The assessee cont...
Author Info
