This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Delhi Rejects Revenue Appeal Over Presumptive Taxation & Jewellery Additions
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Smt. Ashu Ashok (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Smt. Ashu Ashok (ITAT Delhi)
ITAT Delhi Deletes Income Addition Because Section 44AD Did Not Require Detailed Expense Proof; Jewellery Addition Removed as Prior Disclosure Before Settlement Commission Covered Search Findings; No Estimated Expense Disallowance Allowed Under Section 44AD; ITAT Delhi Upholds Deletion of Jewellery Addition Due to Earlier Settlement Disclosure.
In DCIT Vs Smt. Ashu Ashok, the ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting additions made towards undisclosed income and unexplained jewellery for A...
Author Info
