This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Sec. 40A(2)(a) – Onus lies on department to prove excessive or unreasonable expense
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Spark Hotels (P.) Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITAT DELHI
DCIT V/s. Spark Hotels (P.) Ltd.
IT Appeal NO. 4631 (DELHI) OF 2011
ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09
Date of Pronouncement – 22.06.2012
ORDER
A.N. Pahuja, Accountant Member.
This appeal filed on 20.10.2011 by the Revenue against an order dated 29.06.2011 of the CIT(A)-XII, New Delhi, raises the following grounds:-
(1) “The ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts of the case in deleting the addition of Rs. 30 lacs on account of Directors remuneration by invoking the provisions of section 40A(2)(b).
(2) The appellant craves to amend, modify, alter, add or forgo...
