Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanhaiyalal Rameshwar Das Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kanhaiyalal Rameshwar Das Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) Both appeals by the Assessee, a partnership firm of the Bundi Silica Group, Kota engaged in sandstone mining, challenged confirmation of penalties of ₹ 4.04 lakh (A.Y. 2012-13) & ₹ 2.79 lakh (A.Y. 2014-15) levied u/s 271(1)(c). A search u/s 132 was conducted on 05-02-2015 in the group. Pursuant to notice u/s 153A, the Assessee filed return on 08-06-2015 declaring income of ₹ 92.85 lakh. Later, to rectify an omission of ₹ 13.09 lakh (undisclosed investment in plot surrendered during search), it voluntarily filed a revised return on 19-...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930