Mohammad Iqbal Siddiqi Vs Special Director Directorate of Enforcement (Appellate Tribunal Under Safema At Delhi) NRI’s Agricultural Land Confiscation Set Aside, Penalty Halved- Mens Rea Irrelevant, But Penalty Moderated-FEMA Omission No Shield: Tribunal Upholds Validity of Action, But Quashes Confiscation for Proportionality Background This Appeal arose from the order dated 09.01.2017 passed by the […]
The SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal held that NRIs cannot buy agricultural land in India, regardless of intended non-agricultural use. Penalty reduced due to bona fide conduct.
upreme Court held that a trust is not a separate legal entity under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, and only its trustees can be held accountable. A criminal complaint under the NI Act can proceed against the chairman without naming the trust.
An analysis of judicial restraint concerning the RBI’s Wilful Defaulter framework. Learn the precise stage and scope of court intervention under the WDIC and Review Committee process.
The Delhi High Court set aside a Sessions Court order that questioned a sexual assault victim’s character based on her prior relationship with the accused.
SEBI notified new regulations (ICDR Amendment, 2025) to simplify the Rights Issue process, reducing the timeline from 300 days to approximately 23 working days by removing lead manager requirements, reducing disclosures, and streamlining statutory auditor scope.
M/s SBH Impex sought a CAAR ruling on the customs classification of ‘LED Film’ (Flexible LED Display), arguing for CTH 8531. The final decision is pending.
Uniqlo India sought an advance ruling from CAAR Mumbai on classifying imported knit polyester Lounge Sets as Pyjamas (CTH 6107/6108).
Competition Commission of India closed a complaint alleging use of dirty water and false labeling in Maggi Sauce production, holding that such food safety concerns do not amount to abuse of dominance under Section 4 of the Competition Act.
ITAT Jaipur held that the Alumni Association cannot be said to be working for the benefit of its members only and the same will amount for the benefit of public at large. Accordingly, Alumni Association is for the benefit of public and eligible for registration. Thus, appeal is allowed.
