Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunil Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunil Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The appeals pertained to Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15 concerning penalties under Section 271B for failure to audit accounts. The assessee had declared turnover exceeding Rs. 1 crore in both years but did not get his accounts audited as required under Section 44AB. Consequently, the Assessing Officer imposed penalties of Rs. 81,564 and Rs. 78,588, which were upheld by the CIT(A)/NFAC. Before the ITAT, the assessee did not provide any satisfactory explanation or mitigating circumstances that could constitute “reasonable cause” under Section 274 to exc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031