Case Law Details
Case Name : Sunil Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunil Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
The appeals pertained to Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15 concerning penalties under Section 271B for failure to audit accounts. The assessee had declared turnover exceeding Rs. 1 crore in both years but did not get his accounts audited as required under Section 44AB. Consequently, the Assessing Officer imposed penalties of Rs. 81,564 and Rs. 78,588, which were upheld by the CIT(A)/NFAC.
Before the ITAT, the assessee did not provide any satisfactory explanation or mitigating circumstances that could constitute “reasonable cause” under Section 274 to exc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


