Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satbir Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satbir Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Reopening Quashed – AO Recorded Wrong Facts, Wrong AY & Ignored Co-Purchasers; Mechanical 151 Approval Also Invalid The Assessee appealed against the NFAC order dated 20.02.2024 sustaining reassessment u/s 147/143(3) wherein AO had added ₹78,00,000 as unexplained investment u/s 69 on the allegation that the Assessee purchased a property for ₹78 lakh but registered it for only ₹15 lakh. Chronology of earlier proceedings: • Original assessment u/s 143(3) completed on 25.02.2014.• Order revised u/s 263 on 11.02.2016, resulting in fresh assessment u/s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031