Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sharayu Synthetics Processors Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sharayu Synthetics Processors Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai rejects 8% estimation for non-audit u/s 44AB; adopts 2.5% profit based on assessee’s offer In this case, the Mumbai ITAT dealt with estimation of income where the assessee had not complied with audit requirements u/s 44AB. The AO estimated income at 8% of turnover by applying analogy of section 44AD, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal first condoned delay of 341 days in filing the appeal, accepting reasons such as communication issues (email sent to former auditor/retired partner) and personal hardship due to death in ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition No Penalty on Estimated Bogus Purchases: ITAT Deletes U/s 271(1)(c) Levy On-Money Addition Based on Excel Sheet Deleted: No Corroborative Evidence Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930