Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balaji Laxmanrao Sagar Killarikar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balaji Laxmanrao Sagar Killarikar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Tribunal Grants Relief for Savings &; Relatives’ Loans – Addition Sharply Reduced- No Fresh Remand After 15 Years – Relief Granted on Merits Assessee, an advocate by profession, had declared income of Rs.3,29,650/-. AO reopened assessment u/s 147 based on information of investment in immovable property & noted cash deposits of Rs.16.30 lakh in bank. Assessee’s explanation was not accepted & after granting relief for professional receipts of Rs.10.61 lakh, AO sustained addition of Rs.12.50 lakh. CIT(A) gave partial relief ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930