Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jayeshkumar Baldevbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jayeshkumar Baldevbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Reopening Upheld, But DVO vs Valuer Reports Questioned – Capital Gain Addition of Rs. 2.01 Cr Remanded for Fresh Valuation Assessee had not filed return for A.Y. 2014-15. On AIR/ITS data, AO noted sale of immovable property worth Rs.7.91 crore. Reopening u/s 147 was initiated & notice u/s 148 issued on 31.03.2019. Assessee filed return declaring long-term capital loss of Rs.12 lakh, supported by a registered valuer’s report adopting FMV at Rs.300 per sq.mtr. as on 01.04.1981. AO referred matter to DVO, who valued the land at Rs.5.17 ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails When AO Taxes a Different Income Than the One Recorded in Reasons ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Only Profit Element Matters, Not Entire Commodity Transaction Value ITAT Upholds Denial of Section 80GGC Deduction for Donations to Alleged Accommodation Entry Political Party SBI Wins LTC TDS Dispute: No Assessee-in-Default When Bank Followed High Court Orders ITAT: Profit Cannot Be Estimated Arbitrarily Merely Because Books Were Not Produced View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930