Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jayeshkumar Baldevbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jayeshkumar Baldevbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Reopening Upheld, But DVO vs Valuer Reports Questioned – Capital Gain Addition of Rs. 2.01 Cr Remanded for Fresh Valuation Assessee had not filed return for A.Y. 2014-15. On AIR/ITS data, AO noted sale of immovable property worth Rs.7.91 crore. Reopening u/s 147 was initiated & notice u/s 148 issued on 31.03.2019. Assessee filed return declaring long-term capital loss of Rs.12 lakh, supported by a registered valuer’s report adopting FMV at Rs.300 per sq.mtr. as on 01.04.1981. AO referred matter to DVO, who valued the land at Rs.5.17 ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930