Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Shah Nawaz Rana (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Shah Nawaz Rana (ITAT Delhi) Revenue appealed against order of NFAC which deleted addition of Rs.11,21,91,653/- made by AO u/s 68 on account of alleged accommodation entries & bogus purchases. Assessee, an individual deriving income from MLA pension, rent & legal consultancy, had no business activity in AY 2016-17. AO reopened assessment based on survey findings in the case of entry operators Yash Pal Gupta & Rani Sharma, concluding that Assessee was beneficiary of accommodation entries routed through UP Bone Mills Pvt. Ltd. AO held that cash deposits in controlled entities ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930