Case Law Details
Case Name : Sushila Maruti Mhatre Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sushila Maruti Mhatre Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
The Pune ITAT has held that interest received u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on compulsory acquisition of agricultural land is nothing but part of the enhanced compensation itself and therefore cannot be taxed as “interest income” u/s 56(2)(viii) of the Income-tax Act.
The assessee, a housewife, had received compensation relating to agricultural land situated at Village Bokadvira, Taluka Uran, Raigad, which had been compulsorily acquired by the Government way back in 1986 for the New Bombay Project. Pursuant to enhancement ordered by the Civil C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


