Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandrakant Pandharinath Hande Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandrakant Pandharinath Hande Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Assessee, a small-scale commission agent dealing in sale & purchase of lands, filed appeal against the order of NFAC-CIT(A). The appeal challenged confirmation of an addition of ₹ 9,53,539 made by AO towards commission income, which had been treated as income outside the presumptive provisions of Section 44AD. Assessee had not filed return for A.Y. 2013-14. The case was reopened u/s 148. In response, he filed return on 29-11-2019 declaring total income of ₹ 3,23,225 on presumptive basis u/s 44AD & claime refund of ₹ 1,20,760. Duri...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930