Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abdul Jaleel Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Abdul Jaleel Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Fruit Dealer Wins Juicy Relief: ITAT Squeezes Out Section 68 Addition -ITAT Bangalore Treats Entire Bank Deposits as Business Turnover—8% Profit Applied Assessee, a 67-year-old small fruit dealer operating from his residence, had neither maintained books nor filed a return for AY 2015-16. The case was reopened u/s 147 after the Department noticed cash deposits of ₹1.59 crore in his bank accounts. During reassessment, Assessee filed a return declaring gross receipts of ₹92.80 lakh from fruit trading & net profit of ₹8.18 lakh, supported by an aff...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031