Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abdul Jaleel Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Abdul Jaleel Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Fruit Dealer Wins Juicy Relief: ITAT Squeezes Out Section 68 Addition -ITAT Bangalore Treats Entire Bank Deposits as Business Turnover—8% Profit Applied

Assessee, a 67-year-old small fruit dealer operating from his residence, had neither maintained books nor filed a return for AY 2015-16. The case was reopened u/s 147 after the Department noticed cash deposits of ₹1.59 crore in his bank accounts. During reassessment, Assessee filed a return declaring gross receipts of ₹92.80 lakh from fruit trading & net profit

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Routine Business Cash Deposits Not Taxable Despite No ITR Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition Overturned for Earlier Property Booking Revenue’s Section 68 Challenge Rejected on Evidence and Repayment Advance Loss Treated as Trading Loss: ITAT Allows ₹1.5 Cr Write-Off Finance Broker Taxed Only on Brokerage as No Evidence of Income Found View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031