Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs HCC Infrastructure Company Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs HCC Infrastructure Company Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) No Exempt Income, No 14A, No 270A- 14A Disallowance Deleted in Quantum — 270A Penalty Cannot Survive When Quantum Dies, Penalty Revenue filed appeals against CIT(A)’s common orders dated 04.07.2025 deleting penalty u/s 270A for both AYs 2017-18 & 2018-19. Assessee, engaged in infrastructure development on BOT basis, had claimed no exempt income during the relevant years. AO nevertheless made disallowance of ₹8,60,51,556 u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D for AY 2017-18 (& similar for AY 2018-19), which was initially confirmed by CIT(A). AO ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031