Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Samiulla Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Samiulla Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Entire Bank Credits Can’t Be Added Blindly: Three Notices Aren’t Enough: ITAT Restores Bank Credit Case to CIT(A) Natural Justice First:  144 Assessment Needs Care: Matter Remanded for Proper Adjudication Bangalore ITAT “B” Bench, in   Samiulla Vs ITO  (ITA No. 2405/Bang/2024, AY 2018-19; order dated 31.01.2025), set aside the order of CIT(A), NFAC & remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, subject to payment of ₹5,000 as cost. Assessee had not filed return of income, and the case was reopened u/s 147 due to large credits in bank accounts....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031