This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Demonetisation Cash Deposits Taxed Due to No Business Necessity
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ohm Developers Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ohm Developers Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Demonetisation Cash Deposits Upheld as Unexplained: ITAT Ahmedabad Confirms Section 68 Addition for Lack of Business Necessity
The Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT dismissed the assessee’s appeal and upheld the addition of ₹1.72 crore under Section 68 in respect of cash deposits made during the demonetisation period (AY 2017-18). The assessee, a construction firm, claimed that the deposits were sourced from earlier cash withdrawals from disclosed bank accounts. Both the AO and the CIT(A) found the explanation unsatisfactory, noting contin...






