Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kodiambadi Subrahmanya Rai Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement Kodiambadi Subrahmanya Rai Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Bengaluru ITAT Quashes Penalty U/s 271D as Time-Barred – Six-Month Limitation U/s 275(1)(c) Strictly Enforced The Bengaluru ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2020-21 by quashing penalties imposed under Section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as barred by limitation under Section 275(1)(c). The penalties arose from alleged violation of Section 269SS based on statements recorded under Section 132(4) during scrutiny proceedings in the case of another person, leading to notices issued ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,941

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *