Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Parthasaradhi Sukhadevan Madhukumar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Parthasaradhi Sukhadevan Madhukumar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Delay in Filing Appeal Should Be Liberally Condoned When Sufficient Cause Exists – ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore held that the CIT(A) erred in refusing to condone a delay of 122 days and dismissing the appeal without examining merits. Tribunal noted that: The assessee (a senior citizen) became aware of the assessment order only upon accessing the IT portal on 04.08.2022, and filed the appeal on 26.08.2022—thus effectively within time. There was no evidence that the order was served earlier, and therefore the date of knowledge...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031