Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharat Kumar Velusamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Bharat Kumar Velusamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

CIT(A) Passed Order After Assessee’s Death—Violation of Natural Justice; Matter Remanded for Fresh Hearing 

Legal heir filed appeals challenging CIT(A)’s orders dated 30.09.2024. Appeals were delayed by 237 days. Legal heir explained that the deceased assessee never informed him about ongoing assessment/appellate proceedings, & assessee had died on 13.06.2023—well before CIT(A) passed orders in 2024. Tribunal accepted this explanation & condoned delay.

On merits, Tribunal found that

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats Between Third Parties Not Evidence Against Company Without Corroboration Overtime Wages Must Include Allowances Under Factories Act: SC Commission Addition Deleted for Lack of Proof of Accommodation Entries: ITAT Delhi Double Taxation Bar Invoked to Delete Interest TP Adjustment: ITAT Delhi Once Section 263 Order Is Quashed, Fresh Assessment Cannot Survive: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031