Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Mahalaxmi Light House (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

DCIT Vs Mahalaxmi Light House (ITAT Delhi)

Assessment Quashed Entirely—Notices u/s 148A(b), 148A(d) & 148 Invalid for Want of Digital/Manual Signature; Revenue Appeal Infructuous

Assessee, a partnership firm providing tent & lighting services, faced reassessment on allegation of bogus purchases of ₹68.78 lakh from Zenith Enterprises (entry provider Ankit Karanwal) &  under-reported receipts of ₹1.47 crore based on Form 26AS mismatch. AO made additions totalling ₹72,21,918 u/s 69C & difference in receipts. CIT(A) deleted the additions

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment Reopened After 01.04.2021 Held Time-Barred Late Audit Report Not Valid Ground to Deny 80IB Deduction Penalty Set Aside Because Notices Were Not Served as Required by Law IBC Section 7: SC Holds CIRP Admission Mandatory Once Debt & Default Proved; Society Intervention Denied ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes On-Money Additions; Loose Papers Insufficient View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031