Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kalpana Ramesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kalpana Ramesh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Deletes ₹50 Lakh Addition – Mere Search Allegations Against Lender Cannot Make Every Loan Bogus The Mumbai ITAT deleted an addition of ₹50 lakh made u/s 69A in respect of an unsecured loan received through banking channels from M/s Aneri Fincap Ltd. The reassessment was triggered based on search proceedings conducted in the case of “One World Group”, where certain entities including the lender were allegedly found involved in accommodation entry operations. The AO treated the loan as non-genuine and also disallowed consequential inte...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930