Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinod Shyamsunder Pasari Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinod Shyamsunder Pasari Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2015-16 holding that the notice issued u/s 148 on 31.07.2022 was barred by limitation under section 149. The Tribunal noted that though the original notice dated 21.06.2021 was treated as a deemed notice u/s 148A(b) pursuant to the Supreme Court ruling in Ashish Agrawal, the fresh notice issued on 31.07.2022 could not survive since for AY 2015-16 the limitation had already expired on 31.03.2022. The Tribunal heavily relied upon the Revenue’s own concession recorded by the Supreme Court in U...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031