Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Dahyalal Gagjibhai Jiwani (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-2023
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Dahyalal Gagjibhai Jiwani (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Addition Deleted: ITAT Mumbai Upholds CIT(A)’s Finding that Capital Increase Was Only ₹1.95 Crore and Not Unexplained ₹10.63 Crore The Mumbai ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and affirmed the deletion of an addition of ₹10.63 crore made under Section 68 for AY 2022-23. The Assessing Officer had compared the assessee’s total personal capital (₹27.05 crore) with his capital in the partnership firm (₹16.42 crore) and treated the difference as unexplained. The Tribunal held that this comparison was erroneous. On record, t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930