Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pride Foramer S.A. Vs CIT & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Pride Foramer S.A. Vs CIT & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) No Contract ≠ No Business: SC Says Lull Doesn’t Stop Depreciation & Deductions- Commercial Reality Over Technicality – SC Restores Deductions & Set-Off The Appellant, a non-resident French company engaged in offshore drilling, had a 10-year contract with ONGC (1983–1993). After that contract ended, it did not have any drilling contract in India until 1998-99, but during the intervening years it: Maintained continuous correspondence with ONGC, Submitted a bid in 1996 for a new contract (though unsuccessful), Incurred...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031