Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Torane Ispat Udyog Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Torane Ispat Udyog Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) No Specific Limb Mentioned, No Penalty – Defective Notice Cannot Be Cured by Section 292B – ITAT Deletes 271(1)(c) Penalty- Ambiguous 274 Notice Fatal The Revenue appealed against the order of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 21.02.2025 deleting a penalty of ₹4,01,723 levied u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income on bogus purchases. Assessee filed a cross objection, contending that the penalty notice was invalid as it did not specify the charge under which penalty was proposed. Assessee-company had filed a return declaring Nil in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031