Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Torane Ispat Udyog Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Torane Ispat Udyog Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)

No Specific Limb Mentioned, No Penalty – Defective Notice Cannot Be Cured by Section 292B – ITAT Deletes 271(1)(c) Penalty- Ambiguous 274 Notice Fatal

The Revenue appealed against the order of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 21.02.2025 deleting a penalty of ₹4,01,723 levied u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income on bogus purchases. Assessee filed a cross objection, contending that the penalty notice was invalid as it did not specify the charge under which penalty was proposed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalty Deleted After ITAT Quashes Quantum Addition Invalid Notice, Wrong Remand Report & PAN Errors: ITAT Orders Fresh Assessment Seized Papers Showing Cash Payment Treated as Credible Evidence ITAT Clarifies: Working Capital Adjustment May Nullify Interest Addition Disallowance Invalid as Negative Capital Stemmed from Non-Cash Adjustment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031