This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bogus Purchase: ITAT Quashes 271(1)(c) Penalty as Specific Limb not Mentioned
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Torane Ispat Udyog Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Torane Ispat Udyog Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
No Specific Limb Mentioned, No Penalty – Defective Notice Cannot Be Cured by Section 292B – ITAT Deletes 271(1)(c) Penalty- Ambiguous 274 Notice Fatal
The Revenue appealed against the order of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 21.02.2025 deleting a penalty of ₹4,01,723 levied u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income on bogus purchases. Assessee filed a cross objection, contending that the penalty notice was invalid as it did not specify the charge under which penalty was proposed.
Assessee-company had filed a return...





