Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Raj Diamonds (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Raj Diamonds (ITAT Bangalore) Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted – Suspicion from STR Report Insufficient When Purchases Supported by Evidence The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in the business of gold and diamond jewellery, filed its return for AY 2018-19 declaring income of ₹92.24 lakh. Based on a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) alleging that certain suppliers were accommodation entry providers, the AO reopened the assessment and treated purchases of ₹2.49 crore from two entities as bogus, adding the entire amount to income u/s 147. Before the CIT(A), the assessee pr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031