This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
When Amount received can be termed as proceeds of crime liable to be confiscated or for compensation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ravina and Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs CBI & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ravina and Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
Ravina And Associates Pvt Ltd. (Petitioner) were maintaining accounts with National West Minister Bank, London in which the amount transferred by TPE (Techno promexport Russia) to RAPL (’Ravina And Associates Pvt Ltd.’) had been frozen by the order of the Special Court and could not be operated. And the frozen amount is received in India is beyond the amount in relation to the impugned transactions with TPE. So the amount which does not relate to the impugned trans...
Author Info
