Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amarjot Singh Sohi Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amarjot Singh Sohi Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) On-Money Addition Fails Without Proof: Third-Party Excel Sheet Not Enough The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of ₹8 lakh made under section 69 read with section 115BBE, holding that the Revenue failed to prove any actual cash payment (“on-money”) by the assessee for purchase of a shop. The reassessment was initiated solely on the basis of information arising from a search on the seller group (Omaxe Ltd.), wherein an Excel sheet recovered from a third party allegedly reflected cash payments. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid Even if Based on Material from Alleged Illegal Search: Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: Karnataka HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void: Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031