Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amarjot Singh Sohi Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amarjot Singh Sohi Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) On-Money Addition Fails Without Proof: Third-Party Excel Sheet Not Enough The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of ₹8 lakh made under section 69 read with section 115BBE, holding that the Revenue failed to prove any actual cash payment (“on-money”) by the assessee for purchase of a shop. The reassessment was initiated solely on the basis of information arising from a search on the seller group (Omaxe Ltd.), wherein an Excel sheet recovered from a third party allegedly reflected cash payments. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031