Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Sales Tax vs. Sunil Haribhau Pote (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Admittedly, in the present case, there is an endorsement on the packet which was sent to the address of the noticee, namely, the sole proprietor; that the sole proprietor received it but refused to accept the same. When it was sent by R.P.A.D. to the address, it was returned by the postal authorities with the remark, that the addressee refused to accept the packet. That is why it is returned. Thus, the presumption that when the addressee whose address is set out on the envelope had an occasion to notice and peruse the packet, meant for him, but he refuses to acc

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC upholds validity of e-auction sale conducted by bank SC Interprets the word ‘May’ under Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 Interim Compensation under Section 143A of NI Act Not mandatory: SC WhatsApp Messages Not Conclusive Evidence for Addition: ITAT Chennai Draft MoUs and WhatsApp Chats Alone Don’t Form Binding Contracts: SC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31