A) Introduction
Goods and Services Tax (GST) has become the most widely adopted system of indirect taxation globally, with more than 160 countries implementing some form of value-added tax. India, despite being a late entrant, executed one of the world’s most complex and ambitious GST transformations in 2017. The reform replaced a vast network of central and state taxes, unifying the Indian market for the first time since independence. But how does India’s GST compare with global GST/VAT systems?
This article explores the structure, compliance mechanisms, technology, and global positioning of India’s GST in comparison with the world.
B) The Evolution of GST: India’s Unique Journey
While Europe adopted VAT systems in the 1970s and many developing countries followed in the 1990s, India had a much different challenge. With 29 states and multiple indirect tax laws, India’s GST required strong political consensus and extensive restructuring.
The introduction of GST subsumed 17 large taxes and 13 cesses, creating one of the largest unified indirect tax structures globally.
C) Structural Complexity: Multi-Rate India vs. Simplified Global Models
Most global GST systems prefer simplicity. Countries like New Zealand (15%), Singapore (9%), and Australia (10%) operate with a single or limited number of rates.
In contrast, India follows a multi-slab system of 0%, 5% and 18% along with compensation cess for specific luxury and sin goods.
This multi-rate structure reflects India’s large socio-economic diversity, the need to protect essential goods, and the federal nature of the country. However, it also increases classification disputes and compliance burden.
D) The Dual Model: India and Canada Lead the Way
India follows a dual GST model—CGST and SGST for intra-state transactions and IGST for inter-state transactions.
Only a few countries, such as Canada, implement a similar dual structure. Most economies follow a single GST/VAT levy administered centrally.
E) Compliance Burden: India’s High Frequency vs. Global Ease
One of the striking differences between India and other GST nations lies in filing frequency and compliance obligations.
India: Monthly or quarterly returns, e-invoicing, e-way bills, real-time reporting, and stringent input tax credit matching.
Global Systems:
Australia – Quarterly
Singapore – Bi-monthly
UK – Quarterly
Canada – Annual/Quarterly (based on turnover)
While India’s system is technologically advanced, the frequency of filings and documentation requirements make it more compliance-heavy than most countries.
F) Technology Leadership: India as a Global Benchmark
Despite complexities, India’s GSTN is considered one of the world’s most sophisticated tax technology platforms.
Key strengths include:
Real-time invoice validation through e-invoicing
A country-wide e-way bill system
Automated ITC matching
AI-driven fraud analytics
Several developing nations are now studying India’s digital ecosystem to modernise their own GST frameworks.
G) Threshold Limits: India Protects Small Businesses
India maintains one of the highest GST registration thresholds globally:
₹40 lakh for goods
₹20 lakh for services
Comparatively:
Singapore: SGD 1 million (approx. ₹62 lakh)
UK: £90,000
New Zealand: NZD 60,000
Australia: AUD 75,000
India’s higher threshold protects small businesses and MSMEs from regulatory pressure, supporting entrepreneurship and informal trade.
H) Refund Mechanism: India Improving but Still Behind
Export-driven economies like Singapore, New Zealand, and Australia dispose of refunds within 30–45 days.
India, however, often sees refund timelines stretching to 60–90 days, especially when reviews or audits are required.
Although notable progress has been made, India still lags behind global benchmarks in refund speed and automation.
I) Fraud Control and Enforcement: Strong but Challenging
India’s GST ecosystem faces large-scale fake invoicing due to rate arbitrage, supply chain leakages, and the size of the economy. To counter this, India uses:
AI-enabled risk detection
ITC blocking
E-way bill suspension
Strict enforcement actions
While effective, the challenge remains greater compared to smaller or simpler GST jurisdictions.
Unique Characteristics of India’s GST
J) Certain features make India’s GST stand out on the world map:
Anti-profiteering mechanism
GST compensation to states
E-way bill system
Multiple GST councils and consensus-based decision-making
Frequent rate rationalisation exercises
These elements underline India’s federal structure and evolving tax environment.
K) Global Best Practices: Where India Stands
New Zealand: World’s simplest GST
Singapore: Highly business-friendly, low rate
EU: Mature but legally complex
India: Technologically strong, improving structurally but remains compliance-heavy
India’s GST continues to evolve, and ongoing rationalisation efforts aim to move towards a simpler, more uniform tax regime similar to top-performing global systems.
Conclusion
GST beyond boundaries reveals that no two countries implement GST in the same way. India’s GST is a bold experiment — technologically advanced, structurally ambitious, and reflective of a diverse federal nation. While many countries choose simplicity, India balances multiple objectives: revenue needs, socio-economic welfare, and cooperative federalism.
As the system matures, adopting global best practices and streamlining complexity will help India strengthen its position as a modern, efficient, and business-friendly GST regime. The journey ahead is one of continuous refinement, global learning, and progressive transformation.
Author Bio
