Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur Vs. Shah Precicast (P.) Ltd. (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CESTAT, MUMBAI BENCH
Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur
Vs.
Shah Precicast (P.) Ltd.
FINAL ORDER NO. A/145 OF 2011-WZB/C-IV(SMB)
APPEAL NO. E/128 OF 2010
APRIL 5, 2011
ORDER
1. Revenue is in appeal on the ground that xerox copy is not a proper document to avail CENVAT credit in terms of provisions of Rule 9(1)(c) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
2. The facts of the case are that during the course of scrutiny of the records of the respondent it was found that the respondent has taken CENVAT credit on the strength of the xerox copy of the bill of entry which is not a prop...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
0 Comments
Cancel reply
i have lost duplicate for transport copy. we are credit duty?