Supreme Court held that refund of 100% court fees granted as the amount of court fees involved was not excessive and the dispute was resolved amicably by mediation under section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 [CPC].
The appellants before this Court were originally engaged by the Central Water Commission on part-time, ad-hoc terms. Applicant No.1 was appointed as a Safaiwali in 1993, Applicant No.2 as a Safaiwali in 1998, and Applicant No.3 as a Safaiwali in 1999.
SC holds pure coconut oil as edible oilunder Heading 1513 unless marketed as hair oil. Judgment resolves a 15-year excise duty dispute.
Supreme Court clarifies the principles of retrospective taxation in CIT Vs Vatika Township, addressing the application of Section 113 of the Income Tax Act.
In a recent ruling Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that the right to maintenance is equivalent to the right to livelihood, being a subset of the right to dignity and a dignified life, which in turn flows from Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court ruled that unauthorized constructions, even if longstanding, cannot be legitimized under law, citing public interest and urban planning integrity.
Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the revenue in manipulation of share price of SRK Industries recording fictitious Long Term Capital Gain and claiming exemption under section 10(38) by following case of Swati Bajaj.
Held that the Appellant-E.D. is directed to handover and the Respondent successful Resolution Applicant JSW is directed to take over the control of the properties of Corporate Debtor-Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd.
Supreme Court held that petition under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not maintainable since disputed that are related to non-payment of wages and legality and propriety of termination are non-arbitrable.
Supreme Court held that Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 mandates that inquiry report ought to be given to all the concerned parties.
