Supreme Court upholds Labour Court’s factual findings, reinstating a dismissed employee while denying back wages. Read the Ganapati Bhikarao Naik judgment highlights.
Supreme Court held that employee remaining absent from duty for 90 days without intimating employer and employee not responding to notice addressed to delinquent justifies employer action of terminating employee by treating as abandonment of service.
The Supreme Court orders the lifting of a bank account attachment in Rhc Global Exports Vs Union of India, clarifying jurisdiction under GST law.
Supreme Court held that disciplinary proceedings against appellant (commercial tax officer) pertaining to charges punishable with major penalty without oral evidence recorded by department in support of charges is totally vitiated and non-est in the eye of law.
Supreme Court held that a driver holding a license for Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) class, under Section 10(2)(d) for vehicles with a gross vehicle weight under 7,500 kg, is permitted to operate a ‘Transport Vehicle’ without needing additional authorization under Section 10(2)(e) of the MV Act.
Supreme Court held that eligibility criteria, notified at the commencement of the recruitment process, cannot be changed midway through the recruitment process unless the extant Rules so permit.
Supreme Court held that press release cannot be the basis of changing the law. Exemption under the Customs Act has to be via issuance of notification as provided by the Customs Act. Thus, press release cannot be basis for giving away with old legal regime.
This Appeal has been preferred by the son of Shri Jai Prakash, a deceased constable in Haryana Police, seeking appointment on compassionate grounds, as his father and another constable died while on duty on 22.11.1997.
Supreme Court held that cognizance of the offence under section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the public servant without obtaining previous sanction under section 197(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 untenable in law.
Supreme Court rules on whether mobile towers and prefabricated buildings qualify as “capital goods” for CENVAT credit in the telecom sector.
