PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs Adithya Banavar (Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) The Brief facts are: Complainants went to Mantri Mall and purchased one litre water bottle of Aquafina, a 330 ml Pepsi Tin and 350 ml bottle of Nimbooz, which costs them at the rate of Rs.20, Rs.50/- and Rs.50/-, respectively in [&...

As you know that warranties in an insurance policy is some terms and conditions , the fulfilment of those are necessary to bind both parties on contract of insurance. It is utmost important to follow and fulfil warranty and any breach of warranty may lead to termination or avoidance of contract by he insurance company....

HDFC Bank Limited Vs Jesna Jose (NCDRC) In the present case, the Complainant stated that the credit card was in her possession when the disputed transactions had taken place. She has further stated that the transactions had taken place remotely, several miles away from her actual location and therefore, the reason for the fraudulent trans...

Pyaridevi Chabiraj Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. (NCDRC) The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) vide its Order dated 28th August, 2020 in ‘M/s Pyaridevi Chabiraj Steels Pvt. Ltd v/s National Insurance Company Ltd. & 3 Ors.’ (Consumer Case No. 833 of 2020) clearly differentiated in the pecunia...

Passport is not a commodity: No complaint under consumer Act for Delay in Issuance of Passport....

Alok Kumar Vs M/s. Golden Peacock Residency Private Limited & Anr. (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi) In the instant case the Complainants cannot be made to wait indefinitely for possession of the unit, as the construction is yet to be completed even after a period of more than 6 years has lapsed from the [&helli...

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in the case of Amal Ganguli & Anr. v. M/S. Unitech Limited  ordered refund to the Home buyers....

It appears that the Ld. Advocate appearing for the Appellant has mainly contested the appeal on the ground that under such circumstances Opposite Party Nos. 1 and 2 are not required to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the complainant. However, we are of the opinion that contention of the Opposite Party Nos. 1 and 2 in this respect can...

Once it has come on record that the MRP of the product includes all taxes, it was not open for the trader to impose VAT again on the discounted price....

Whether the T.D.S. is deductible on the compensation paid to the unfortune parents, whose child dies in an escalator maintained by an Airport Authority...