DCIT Vs Azalea Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) The facts clearly shows that on October 20, 2010, India Bulls Power Ltd pursuant to the provisions of Section 192A of the Companies Act, 1956 made a preferential allotment of 42 crore as fully convertible warrants to 4 different companies which are the entities promoted by the […]
Loesche India Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The record reveals that the assessee had paid the insurance premiums of the employees’ family members in terms of employment Rules framed by the assessee-company there for. Therefore, it can hardly be said that the impugned expenditure were not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of […]
Disallowance u/s 14A got restricted to the extent of exempt income, even if the provisions of the section 14A were attracted.
Deloitte Haskins & Sells Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Amount of tax deducted at source from the payment made to the recipient of such income could be said to be the amount of expenditure incurred by assessee and paid during the year and, therefore, it was allowable to assessee as business expenditure. Held: AO did […]
Rayban Sun Optics India Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) We are of the considered opinion that the ALP of an international transaction involving AMP expenses, the adjustment made by the TPO/DRP/AO is not sustainable in the eyes of law. At the same time, we cannot ignore the submission of the learned DR that the matter […]
Hindustan Coca-Cola Marketing Company Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) We have carefully considered the facts of the case that the assessee stated that approximately 10000 cases were pulled back by the assessee from the market in view of the exceptional quality issues. The assessee submitted that the above quality issue is the pulled back […]
Add. CIT Vs Ircon International Ltd (ITAT Delhi) When we examine the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer in the instant case in the light of the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Madhukar Khosla (supra), it is evident that the Assessing Officer has merely perused the records available with […]
Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) At the outset, we find merit in the contention of the Ld. Counsel of the Assessee that in the absence of any adverse judgment by the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court, i.e., the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana, there being divergence of judicial opinion on the subject […]
Discount offered on some of the prepaid mobile services did not partake the character of commission under Section 194H and hence there was no obligation to withhold tax on such discounts on prepaid services.
AO was not justified in denying the claim of deduction under section 80IC as interest income earned was inextricably linked to the main business activity of assessee as it was earned from fixed deposits which was required to be maintained as per the statutory requirements.
