DCIT Vs Hero Fin Corp Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The assessee is earning lease rent from the lease charges of cars, plant & machinery given on hire to M/s Hero MotoCorp. The AO held that the income of the hire charges are to be chargeable under the head “income from other sources” but not under the […]
Amadeus India challenges ITAT Delhi’s transfer pricing adjustment on AMP expenses and disallowance under section 14A. Full text of the ITAT order provided.
DCIT Vs Realistic Realitors Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) In this case the A.O. in the light of information emanating from the search of Shri Praveen Agarwal came to the conclusion that assessee has wrongly claimed deduction on account of sub-brokerage paid to M/s. Taral Vincom Pvt. Ltd., The A.O. in the entire assessment order did […]
ACIT Vs IKEA Trading (India) Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) We find that the assessee has sold assets at the WDV of the assets as per company law whereas the TPO held that the assessee ought to have sold the assets at the value of the WDV of the block of assets as per the Income […]
M.L. Singhi & Associates (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) No addition could be made against the assessee if no incriminating material was found during the course of search It is not in dispute that whatever queries were raised by the A.O. time to time, have been replied by assessee along with documentary evidences. All […]
Shri Praveen Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) There is no dispute with regard to the legal proposition that the First Appellate Authority cannot consider new source of income. However, in the present case the A.O. reopened the assessment because it was found that there were cash deposits in several Bank accounts of the assessee which […]
Sanjiv Ahuja Vs ITO (International Taxation) (ITAT Delhi) Deduction u/s 54 is restricted to only one residential house by the Finance Act 2014 is prospective in nature and is effective from assessment year 2015-16 and not retrospective in nature and that deduction u/s 54 of the Act in respect of investment made in one residential […]
The A.O. entirely on different reasons that there is a common Director in 03 companies and common address disbelieved the explanation of assessee. It may not be relevant criteria to decide the issue under section 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961.
Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) We find that on the issue of reasonable cause u/s.273B, assessee does has a prima facie case, because as per the CBDT Circular No. 275 dated 21.09.1994, it has been clarified that responsibility for making deduction tax at source u/s. 194A should be that of Collector (Land Acquisition) […]
RITES Limited Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) Perusal of the assessment orders goes to prove that AO has mechanically disallowed the claim of expenditure made by the assessee company towards Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and sustainable development without analyzing the fact that assessee company being a Government undertaking is required to incur such expenses as […]
