CIT had power to correct an error, which was prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue in the order of AO, even if it was approved by the Joint Commissioner, who was also falling below the rank of the Pr. Commissioner. Whatever was to be excluded by the law had already been provided under that Section and the only exception were the issues ‘decided and considered’ in the appellate orders.
JNS Instruments Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) The Commissioner can regard the order as erroneous on the ground that in the circumstances of the case the Income-tax Officer should have made further inquiries before accepting the statements made by the assessee in his return.The reason is obvious. The position and function of the Income Tax […]
Once the transaction is found to be recorded in the regular books of account, provisions of section 69 do not apply and the CIT(A) had, therefore, rightly deleted the addition which calls for no interference.
Action of the Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition of Rs.75 lakhs on the basis of sole statement of one dummy director, recorded during the survey action in case of that company, without confronting the same to the assessee, cannot be held to be justified.
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Additional CIT National E-Assessment Centre (ITAT Delhi) From the report of the Assessing Officer as well as the clarification given by the ld. counsel it is seen that there are a huge refunds which are due to the assessee and as per the report of the Assessing Officer, substantial […]
JCIT Vs Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) A comparable should not be rejected simply on the ground that is margin is extremely high (or low) in relative comparison to the data pertaining to its peers. It is specifically observed by the CIT(A) that the rejection of the two comparables by the TPO, are […]
Disallowance could not be made on interest for earning exempt income under section 14A as assessee had available, non-interest-bearing funds larger than the investments made in tax- free securities.
National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Delhi) In the instant case before us also, the expenses have been incurred on the direction of the relevant Ministry / Government of India. Further, neither the Assessing Officer nor the learned DR has rebutted the contention of the assessee that expenses have been incurred for […]
Ikea Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The TPO has not accepted the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of Li & Fund [supra] solely on the ground that an appeal has been recommended before the Hon’ble Apex Court. In our considered view, when the operation of […]
TV Today Network Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT(A) (ITAT Delhi) Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Exide Industries (Supra) held that the claim with regard to leave encashment has to be allowed on cash basis i.e. actual payment basis and not on accrual basis. It is pertinent to note that the payments with regards to the […]
