income from technical handling is exempt from taxation in India as the same is covered under Article 8 of the DTAA between India & Netherlands and hence not liable to tax in India.
Assessment framed by the AO is on other issues which is not part of the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment. In such a situation, the assessment order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
Krishan Kumar Goel Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) AO has made additions and computed the income at Rs.1,88,85,961/-. Nowhere in the order of the AO there is any whisper that AO is not satisfied by the compliance by the assessee to his notices or queries. Now, the same AO has passed the above said penalty order. […]
DCIT Vs Jammu Pigments Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Assessing Officer initiated proceeding under section 154 of the Act to make the disputed disallowance while computing the book profit and ultimately did so. Therefore, it is evident, the 154 proceeding was at the behest of the Revenue audit. Applicability of section 14A read with Rule 8D to […]
ITAT held that the absence of service of notice u/s 148/143(2) of the Act, reassessment framed u/s 147 r.w.s 143(3) of the Act will be null and void.
Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust Vs JCIT (E) (ITAT Delhi) The issue in the present ground is with respect of claim of loss as application of income. It is an undisputed fact that the loss that assessee had incurred on sale of fixed assets and the same has been debited to the income and expenditure account […]
Barapur Gramodyog Vikas Samiti Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The AO while completing the assessment noticed that the assessee claimed exemption u/s 10(23B) of the Act as the assessee was engaged in the business of production, sale, etc. of Khadi and Products of Village Industries. The AO was of the view that in view of proviso […]
Merely reproducing the conclusions of investigation report in his own words is indeed borrowed satisfaction as contended by counsel for the assessee. Consequently, the Bench is inclined to decide these grounds of cross objection in favour of the assessee.
As section 50C applies only to a capital asst, being land or building or both, it cannot be made applicable to lease rights in a land.
Bharat Rana Chaudhry Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT find that sub-clause (iii) of section 271(l)(c) provides mechanism for quantification of penalty. It contemplates that the assessee would be directed to pay a sum in addition to taxes, if any, payable him, which shall not be less than but which shall not exceed three times the […]
