Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT  Vs Anand Pershad Jaiswal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2000-01
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT  Vs Anand Pershad Jaiswal (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Subsequent amendment to section 149, by Finance Act, 2012 which extended limitation for initiation of reassessment proceedings to sixteen years could not be resorted for reopening concluded proceedings and the notice issued under Section 149 was time barred and thus could not have been acted upon. Consequently, the impugned re-assessment order passed in consequence of the illegal notice under Section 148 was a nullity and bad in law. Held: Assessee was an individual and holding the status of Non-Resident Indian for the previous year rele...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930