Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT  Vs Anand Pershad Jaiswal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2000-01
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT  Vs Anand Pershad Jaiswal (ITAT Delhi)

Conclusion: Subsequent amendment to section 149, by Finance Act, 2012 which extended limitation for initiation of reassessment proceedings to sixteen years could not be resorted for reopening concluded proceedings and the notice issued under Section 149 was time barred and thus could not have been acted upon. Consequently, the impugned re-assessment order passed in consequence of the illegal notice under Section 148 was a nullity and bad in law.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31