Delhi ITAT removes penalty on Riyasat Palaces Limited in tax dispute with ACIT, redefining interpretation of inaccurate particulars.
Get a comprehensive breakdown of the ITAT Delhi case, Rukshana Begum vs ITO, involving explained funds and investment for wife’s financial security in old age.
ITAT Delhi held that rendering cloud computing services/ Amazon Web Services (AWS Services) cannot be held to be liable to tax in India either as royalty or as Fees for Technical Services (FTS)/ Fees for Included Services (FIS).
ITAT Delhi held that issuance of notice u/s 153C of the Income Tax beyond six Assessment Year immediately preceding the Assessment year from the date of recording of satisfaction note/ handling over of relevant material is not in accordance with law.
Read the full text of the order by ITAT Delhi in Virender Rathee vs ITO case. The ITAT allows tax deduction on interest received from enhanced compensation against compulsory acquisition of agricultural land.
CIT(A) resolved the appeal, considering the TDS credit issue, on 08/05/2019. Therefore, PCIT can’t invoke s.263 revision proceedings for the same issue, per Explanation-1(c) to section 263(1) of the Act.
ITAT Delhi held that income classified as ‘business income’ but not considered for the purpose of working of deduction u/s 80HHC merely on the nomenclature that income are not derived from export is unjustifiable as it is not justified that income has no nexus with earning of export.
Explore the case Dariyav Singh Vs ITO. Understand why the Assessing Officer was deemed unfit to rectify the Principal CIT’s mistake in form 5 under VSVS Scheme.
In present facts of the case, it was held that the services rendered were in the nature of advisory services as per the terms of the agreement, therefore these services cannot be the part of Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13 of India – UK DTAA.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal while deducting the additions made by Ld. AO for repair and maintenance, it was observed that if the replacement is of a baby part only, then the same cannot be considered to be a capital expenditure.
