Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Nitrex Chemicals India Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) If whole machine is replaced instead of a part then only the expenses would be treated as Capital Expenditure Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal while deducting the additions made by Ld. AO for repair and maintenance, it was observed that if the replacement is of a baby part only, then the same cannot be considered to be a capital expenditure. It is only when a baby part alone cannot be repaired and the whole of machine is required to be replaced, the expenditure of replacement will be of capital nature. Facts: In p...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930